Introduction
This page examines the biblical evidence for human sacrifice—defined as the ritualistic killing of humans as offerings to deities—and explores the tensions these texts create within biblical ethics.
God & Human Sacrifice
The Binding of Isaac
While Isaac was spared at the last moment, the text presents the initial command as a test of Abraham's faithfulness, with Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son portrayed positively. The New Testament highlights Abraham's willingness to sacrifice Isaac as an act of faith in Hebrews 11:17-19, further reinforcing the positive framing of Abraham's intended human sacrifice.
Jephthah's Daughter
The text states that Jephthah "did to her as he had vowed" (Judges 11:39). This sacrifice occurs after "the Spirit of the LORD came on Jephthah" (Judges 11:29), implying divine involvement. While some interpreters suggest Jephthah's daughter was dedicated to temple service rather than sacrificed, the text's reference to a "burnt offering" and the mourning of her death contradict this reading.
The Conquest
The Hebrew term חרם (herem) means "devoted" or "consecrated" to God, indicating these mass killings were understood as offerings or sacrifices. Those who violated the ban were themselves subject to destruction (Joshua 7:1-26).
God commands some cities to be burned, as burnt offerings to Him:
Seven Sons of Saul
To end a famine, God instructs David to hand over seven descendants of Saul to the Gibeonites, who "impaled them on the mountain before the Lord."
This execution of seven men is portrayed as a sacrifice necessary to appease God and end a famine. The text specifically notes it was done "before the Lord" and that afterward "God answered prayer on behalf of the land."
Child Sacrifice Portrayed as God's Command
In Ezekiel, God appears to claim he gave bad laws requiring child sacrifice.
While interpretations vary, the plain reading suggests God admits to giving laws requiring firstborn sacrifice to teach Israel a lesson. This passage has created significant difficulties for interpreters.
Mesha's Son as an Effective Sacrifice (2 Kings 3:26-27)
Mesha, king of Moab, sacrifices his firstborn son, resulting in Israel's defeat.
This account seems to portray human sacrifice as effectively invoking divine power against Israel. The "fury" (Hebrew: qetseph, often used for divine wrath) that drove Israel away implies the sacrifice worked as intended. The text doesn't condemn the practice but instead portrays the sacrifice as successfully turning the tide of the battle, with the Israelite army retreating.
Jesus as Human Sacrifice
Jesus as a Human Sacrifice in the New Testament
The New Testament explicitly portrays Jesus's death as a human sacrifice to God.
The New Testament authors consistently describe Jesus's death using sacrificial language drawn from the Hebrew sacrificial system. Jesus is portrayed as the ultimate human sacrifice that pleases God and atones for sin.
Theological Implications
The framing of Jesus's death as a necessary sacrifice has several implications:
- God required sacrificial death for forgiveness
- Blood must have been shed to atone for wrongdoing
- God could not forgive sin without human sacrifice
- Salvation is fundamentally based on human sacrifice